Margaret J. Kay, Ed.D. NCSP
Educational Psychologist

Margaret J. Kay, Ed.D. Psychologist
Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP)
Pennsylvania Licensed Psychologist
Pennsylvania Certified School Psychologist
 

2818 Lititz Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601-3322
Phone:  (717) 569-6223
FAX: (717) 560-9931
EMAIL:
MJK@MargaretKay.com

Specializing in the recognition and understanding of individual differences.

Home Vita & Publications Client Forms Driving Directions Office Tour Testimonials Search & Contacts Privacy Practices

Law & Regulations

Home
PsychCorp
Evaluations & IDEA
IEP's and IDEA 2004
Legal Corner
Evidenced Based
Response Intervention
Due Process
High Qualiy

Several education based photos surrounding the IDEA Partnership logo. Also displayed are the phrases Early Childhood Providers, Teachers, Families, Youth, Policymakers, Administrators, Advocates, Related Service Providers.


Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA 2004)

  • The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) aligns IDEA closely to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), helping to ensure equity, accountability and excellence in education for children with disabilities.
     

  • The U.S. Department of Education publishes a wealth of information for teachers, administrators, policymakers, researchers, parents, students, and others with a stake in education.
     
  • The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004), a major reauthorization of IDEA 97, continues to ensure that all children with disabilities have a free appropriate public education (FAPE) and that the rights of such children and their parents are protected. It also aligns to the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Some of the changes made in IDEA 2004 focus on improving educational outcomes for students with disabilities rather than the special education process. Other changes emphasize the need to reduce paperwork and expand opportunities to reduce disagreements between schools and parents.

    Additional information about IDEA 2004 is available in the Resources section of the PaTTAN site. You can also utilize the following web site links for more information about IDEA 2004:
     


IDEA–Reauthorized Statute1
ALIGNMENT WITH THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT

The reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was signed into law on Dec. 3, 2004, by President George W. Bush. The provisions of the act will be effective on July 1, 2005, with the exception of some elements of the definition of “highly qualified teacher” that took effect upon the signing of the act. This is one in a series of documents, prepared by the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) in the U.S. Department of Education, that covers a variety of high-interest topics and brings together the statutory language related to those topics to support constituents in preparing to implement the new requirements. This document addresses provisions of IDEA regarding the alignment between IDEA and No Child Left Behind, referred to in this document as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, which will take effect on July 1, 2005. It does not address any changes that may be made by the final regulations.
 

IDEA 2004:

1. Adds New Definitions
Core Academic Subjects: the term “core academic subjects” means English, reading or language arts; mathematics; science; foreign languages; civics and government; economics; the arts; history; and geography. [9101] of ESEA; [602(4)] of IDEA.

Limited English Proficient: the term “limited English proficient,” when used with respect to an individual, means an individual:
 
  • Who is aged 3 through 21;
     
  • Who is enrolled or preparing to enroll in an elementary school or secondary school;
     
  • Who was not born in the United States or whose native language is a language other than English;
     
  • Who is a Native American or Alaska Native, or a native resident of the outlying areas; and
     
  • Who comes from an environment where a language other than English has had a significant impact on the individual's level of English language proficiency; or
     
  • Who is migratory, whose native language is a language other than English, and who comes from an environment where a language other than English is dominant; and
     
  • Whose difficulties in speaking, reading, writing or understanding the English language may be sufficient to deny the individual:
     
  • The ability to meet the state's proficient level of achievement on state assessments described in Section 1111(b)(3) of ESEA;
     
  • The ability to successfully achieve in classrooms where the language of instruction is English; or
     
  • The opportunity to participate fully in society.


[9101] of ESEA; [602(18)] of IDEA.

Highly Qualified: for a complete definition of the term “highly qualified,” please refer to the “Highly Qualified Teachers” document. [9101] of ESEA; [602(10)(F)] of IDEA.

2. Funds reserved to carry out state-level activities can be used
…to support the development and provision of appropriate accommodations for children with disabilities, or the development and provision of alternate assessments that are valid and reliable for assessing the performance of children with disabilities, in accordance with Sections 1111(b) and 6111 of ESEA. [611(e)(2)(C)(x)] of IDEA.

3. Use of funds in schoolwide programs
...a local educational agency (LEA) may use funds received under this part for any fiscal year to carry out a schoolwide program under Section 1114 of ESEA, except that the amount so used in any such program shall not exceed:
 

  • The number of children with disabilities participating in the schoolwide program, multiplied by
     
  • The amount received by the LEA under this part for that fiscal year, divided by
     
  • The number of children with disabilities in the jurisdiction of that agency.

[613(a)(2)(D)(i)(ii)(I)(II)] of IDEA.

4. Use of funds to carry out activities under ESEA
If an LEA exercises the authority under clause (i), the agency shall use an amount of local funds equal to the reduction in expenditures under clause (i) to carry out activities authorized under ESEA. [613(a)(2)(C)(ii)] of IDEA.

5. Performance goals and indicators
The state has established goals for the performance of children with disabilities in the state that:

  • Promote the purposes of this title as stated in Section 601(d) of IDEA;
  • Are the same as the state's definition of adequate yearly progress (AYP), including the state's objectives for progress by children with disabilities, under Section 1111(b)(2)(C) of ESEA;
  • Address graduation rates and dropout rates, as well as such other factors as the state may determine; and
     
  • Are consistent, to the extent appropriate, with any other goals and standards for children established by the state.

In addition, the state must establish performance indicators it will use to assess progress toward achieving the goals described in Section 612(a)(15)(A) of IDEA, including measurable annual objectives for progress by children with disabilities under Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II)(c) of the ESEA. [612(a)(15)(A) and (B)] of IDEA.

6. Reporting
[The state] will annually report to the secretary and to the public on its progress, and the progress of children with disabilities, toward meeting the goals established under Section 612(a)(15)(A) of IDEA, that may include elements of the reports required under Section 1111(h) of ESEA. [612(a)(15)(C)] of IDEA.

7. Alternate achievement standards
If the state has adopted alternate academic achievement standards permitted under the regulations promulgated to carry out Section 1111(b)(1) of ESEA, the guidelines under Section 612(a)(16)(c)(i) of ESEA shall provide for alternate assessments that … measure the achievement of children with disabilities against those standards. [612(a)(16)(C)(ii)(II)] of IDEA.

8. Records of migratory children
The LEA shall cooperate in the secretary's efforts under Section 1308 of ESEA to ensure the linkage of records pertaining to migratory children with a disability for the purpose or electronically exchanging, among the states, health and educational information regarding such children. [613(a)(9)] of IDEA.

9. Eligibility determination
In making a determination of eligibility under Section 614(b)(4)(A) of the IDEA, a child shall not be determined to be a child with a disability if the determinant factor is a lack of appropriate instruction in reading, including in the essential components of reading instruction as defined in Section 1208(3) of ESEA. [614(b)(5)(A)] of IDEA.

10. Alignment of personnel development plans
The application [for a state personnel development grant] shall include a plan that identifies and addresses state and local needs for preparation and professional development of personnel, as well as individuals who provide direct supplementary aids and services to children with disabilities, and that … is integrated and aligned, to the maximum extent possible, with state plans and activities under ESEA. [653(a)(2)(C)] of IDEA.
 



Learning Disabilities Resource Kit

Early Intervention and Response to Intervention Evaluating if a Program is Research-Based
RTI and LD Identification Executive Summary Getting Started with LD Determination
Publications Parent Involvement in School Improvement
Educators FAQ on Response to Intervention Resource List for LD and RTI
RTI How to do It RTI Brief
RTI Digest RTI in SLD Identification
RTI Research to Practice RTI Screening Tool
SLD Overview Students with SLD 2007
Who is a Student with a Learning Disability? What is Progress Monitoring?
What is RTI? Identifying SLD
Implementing Change RTI Overview Presentation
Tier Two Interventions Topical Forum

This site was designed by Margaret J. Kay, Ed.D.  Its contents are presented for informational and educational purposes only and are not to be construed as professional advice on medical, legal, technical or therapeutic matters.  By using and accessing the information on this site, you agree to waive any rights to hold the site developer, or any individual and/or group associated with this site, liable for any damage that may result from the use of the information presented here.

© Copyright 2007-2008 Margaret J. Kay. All rights reserved.

The copyright of design, text and images on this web site is owned by Margaret J. Kay or the individual copyright owners as noted elsewhere on this site.  You may download and reprint articles from this web site for non-commercial, private, educational purposes only.  You may not in any way modify, or publicly distribute, any information contained within this site without specific permission form the copyright owner.

Send mail to MJK@MargaretKay.com with questions or comments about this web site.

Last modified: January 03, 2008