Margaret J. Kay, Ed.D. NCSP
Educational Psychologist

Margaret J. Kay, Ed.D. Psychologist
Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP)
Pennsylvania Licensed Psychologist
Pennsylvania Certified School Psychologist
 

2818 Lititz Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601-3322
Phone:  (717) 569-6223
FAX: (717) 560-9931
EMAIL:
MJK@MargaretKay.com

Specializing in the recognition and understanding of individual differences.

Home Up Vita & Publications Client Forms Driving Directions Office Tour Testimonials Search & Contacts Privacy Practices

Response Intervention

Home
Up
Progress Monitoring
RTI Fact Sheets
RTI & Assessment

Several education based photos surrounding the IDEA Partnership logo. Also displayed are the phrases Early Childhood Providers, Teachers, Families, Youth, Policymakers, Administrators, Advocates, Related Service Providers.


Three-Tiered Model of Reading Instruction

Pennsylvania RTI: What it is and What it is Not

Pennsylvania RTI


The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, IDEA, was rewritten and signed into law in early December 2004. This Act changes many sections of the statute to reflect new ideas around learning disabilities and the concept of a pre-identification strategy called response to intervention or RTI.

The emphasis of RTI is to focus on providing more effective instruction by encouraging earlier intervention for students experiencing difficulty learning. The assumption is that this will prevent some students from being identified as learning disabled or LD by providing intervention as concerns emerge. It also emphasizes using a comprehensive, school-wide system because…almost 30 years of research and experience has demonstrated that the education of children with disabilities can be made more effective by providing incentives for whole-school approaches. (601, c, 5, F)


Articles & Research

IMPLEMENTATION OF IDEA: INTEGRATING RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION

AND COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT METHODS

JAMES B. HALE
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine

ALAN KAUFMAN
Yale University School of Medicine

JACK A. NAGLIERI
George Mason University

KENNETH A. KAVALE
Regent University

ABSTRACT: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) was reauthorized by the U.S. Congress in 2004, yet ongoing regulatory efforts are required to determine its operationalization and implementation. Of particular concern to school psychologists and others involved in the educational process are the guidelines for identification of children with specific learning disabilities (SLD). Two seemingly opposite camps have been arguing for either a response-to-intervention (RTI) approach for SLD identification or a methodology that includes comprehensive evaluations for SLD identification and intervention purposes. In this article, the authors propose a resolution to these critical issues by emphasizing a multi-tiered approach to serving children with learning problems—one that begins with RTI, but then provides for comprehensive evaluation of cognitive processes if RTI methods are not successful in ameliorating the child’s learning difficulties. If a child fails to respond to intervention and demonstrates a deficit in the basic psychological processes following comprehensive evaluation, both the definitional criteria for SLD and the method for determining SLD eligibility will be addressed. This methodology incorporates the best aspects of both the RTI and comprehensive evaluation perspectives to forge a balanced practice model that ensures diagnostic accuracy and optimizes educational outcomes for children with SLD. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE

 


  • Responsiveness to Intervention: an Alternative Approach to the Identification of Learning Disabilities by Frank Gresham, University of California, Riverside.

    The concept of responsiveness to intervention appears to be a viable alternative approach to defining learning disability, particularly in light of the myriad difficulties with discrepancy-based models. In addition, assessment procedures should contribute to the planning and implementation of more effective treatments to remediate academic deficits. However, before the field can adopt responsiveness to intervention in eligibility determination, a host of unresolved issues await further investigation and deliberation.
     

  • Responsiveness-to-Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct. Douglas Fuchs, Devery Mock, Paul L. Morgan and Caresa L. Young.

    Longstanding concern about how learning disabilities (LD) are defined and identified, coupled with recent efforts in Washington, DC to eliminate IQ-achievement discrepancy as an LD marker, have led to serious public discussion about alternative identification methods. The most popular of the alternatives is responsiveness-to-intervention (RTI), of which there are two basic versions: the "problem-solving" model and the "standard-protocol" approach. The authors describe both types, review empirical evidence bearing on their effectiveness and feasibility, and conclude that more needs to be understood before RTI may be viewed as a valid means of identifying students with LD.

Three Tiered Model of RTI Annotated Bibliography on RTI
Argument Against RTI Criticism of Discrepancy Formula
Determining AYP with CBM RTI & Early Intervention
Final Report on RTI How Much Growth Should We Expect?
IDEA & RTI International Reading Association and RTI
Introduction to RTI Kavale Article on RTI
Making Sense of RTI Math Fluency and RTI
Monitoring Student Progress RTI & Progress Monitoring
What is Scientifically Based Research? RTI Models

On-line Resources

  • LD Online's RTI Model
    The response-to-invention (RTI) model is also often called the Three-Tiered Model. It is being proposed as an alternative to the Discrepancy Model, the "Wait to Fail Model," as it is often called by proponents of the RTI model. In the past most state education programs have used the discrepancy model for the identification of learning disabilities. http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/assessment/response_to_intervention.html
     

  • Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium - December 4-5, 2003 * Kansas City, Missouri. Jeff Grimes and Dave Tilly presented at the NRCLD symposium and their papers can be found at http://www.nrcld.org/html/symposium2003/index.html.
     

Responsiveness-to-Intervention Evaluation Technical Assistance &Dissemination Activities

The Responsiveness-to-Intervention Model Site research is one activity NRCLD has undertaken to inform our work. NRCLD will work with the nation's six Regional Resource Centers (RRCs) to:

  1. Implement these activities, including identifying, evaluating, providing technical assistance and dissemination information on RTI procedures and model sites
  2. Explore the adequacy of RTI models as alternative models of identifying students with specific learning disabilities
  3. Discover best practices of RTI currently in use

http://www.nrcld.org/html/research/rti.html


Learning Disabilities Resource Kit

Early Intervention and Response to Intervention Evaluating if a Program is Research-Based
RTI and LD Identification Executive Summary Getting Started with LD Determination
Publications Parent Involvement in School Improvement
Educators FAQ on Response to Intervention Resource List for LD and RTI
RTI How to do It RTI Brief
RTI Digest RTI in SLD Identification
RTI Research to Practice RTI Screening Tool
SLD Overview Students with SLD 2007
Who is a Student with a Learning Disability? What is Progress Monitoring?
What is RTI? Identifying SLD
Implementing Change RTI Overview Presentation
Tier Two Interventions Topical Forum

 


This site was designed by Margaret J. Kay, Ed.D.  Its contents are presented for informational and educational purposes only and are not to be construed as professional advice on medical, legal, technical or therapeutic matters.  By using and accessing the information on this site, you agree to waive any rights to hold the site developer, or any individual and/or group associated with this site, liable for any damage that may result from the use of the information presented here.

© Copyright 2007-2008 Margaret J. Kay. All rights reserved.

The copyright of design, text and images on this web site is owned by Margaret J. Kay or the individual copyright owners as noted elsewhere on this site.  You may download and reprint articles from this web site for non-commercial, private, educational purposes only.  You may not in any way modify, or publicly distribute, any information contained within this site without specific permission form the copyright owner.

Send mail to MJK@MargaretKay.com with questions or comments about this web site.

Last modified: January 03, 2008